Game 3: Shoulda Had a V-8

As I sit here watching the 60th Primetime Emmy Awards, I find myself wondering what could be more painful: Watching the Saints lose the way they just did to the Broncos or getting my foot caught in a bear trap before landing eyeball first into the pointy end of an Emmy statue. I’m still deciding.

The thing is, when the Saints went down 21-3, I didn’t panic. I calmly asked the waiter at Dave and Busters for another round of the “Walk the Plank” (which I assumed on an empty stomach would be the equivalent of a horse tranquilizer.) Just before the drink arrived, I turned to the fellow Who Dat next to me and said, “Reggie will rebound and help us win this game.” Never before has “almost” being right hurt so much.

This was a statement game for our entire team. Not the cliched “must-win” but a statement game. By the end of the game, the Saints had in fact made several statements.

1. Our offense wasn’t dead in those first 9 quarters of the season. It was just on hiatus. So beware bitches, cuz when we’re hot, we’re scary good.

2. Our defense is still suspect but capable of making just as many big plays as they give up. We need to get healthy, stat.

3. We gambled by keeping Martin Gramatica and cutting Taylor Mehlhaff. We gambled and lost.

4. On 3rd and one with the game on the line, we’ve got 1 trick in our bag…and it ain’t that tricky.

Those first two bullet points account for the Saints heroic comeback from an 18 point deficit. The last two pretty much sum up how we tossed this game in the shitter. While I respect the Broncos for their goal line stance against the Saints in the first half, I have to think a defense only deserves so much kudos for responding to the exact same play run four times in a row with not even the threat of play action. Reggie Bush, the man who was living up to my prophecy by out running and shaking the hell out of the Broncos defense, was on the sidelines…for ALL four downs. So was Deuce.  And it’s not that I thought Reggie could have run it up the gut any more than Pierre Thomas or Mike Karney. It’s that having him on the field would have scared the bee-jeezus out of the Broncos just enough to set up a nice play action run or a pass to the back of the end zone. I mean, it was worth a shot on at least one of the downs, right?

And what about that crucial 3rd and 1 at the end of the fourth quarter? Did anyone sense deja vu…all over again? Hey, I’m one of Pierre’s biggest fans, but when the defense stacks the box on an obvious running play, there’s about a 50/50 shot he’ll pick up the yard on 3rd and 1.

I can’t help but ask myself, “wouldn’t it be great if we had another running back to help set up the play action on these crucial 3rd downs?” Oh wait we do, don’t we?  So why the hell were #25 (Bush) and #26 (Deuce) yet again on the sidelines? Why, after putting on an exhilarating offensive showing, did we decide to put our balls back in our purse when it counted? I’m not saying a reverse to Devery Henderson should have been the call.  I just want some good, ole fashioned, throwing the defense off balance. Is that really too much to ask? I mean, really?

Shall I even address our little “Curly Sue” kicker? (What’s that you say Devil on my shoulder? Rip him to shreds? Oh if you insist!) You know I only winced mildly when we decided to keep Gramatica over the rookie Taylor Mehlhaff. But I trusted the coaching staff on this call and I wanted the best for you Martin, because I love an underdog story. Well underdog, it’s time we put you down. With our defense being so unpredictable and injury prone, there’s no telling how many times we’re going to call on our kicker to be Mr. Clutch. Leaving 6 points on the field in a game like this one is not just unacceptable, it’s cut-worthy. Yeah I said it…cut-worthy! I refuse to have a repeat of the Olindo Mare era. I won’t go back to that dark place.

It’s much too early in the season to start vomiting blood over the kicks to the gut we’ve experienced in back-to-back Sundays. I mean 1-2 ain’t pretty, but things could be worse.  We could have been clobbered and left wondering if our offense would ever show up. 

I firmly believe that once the blinding rage dissipates and the nausea subsides, we, much like the team, will walk away from this more hopeful than dissappointed.  Still, it sucks to waste a good buzz and suffer through another bad hangover on a Saints loss.  I ordered the “Walk the Plank”,   but I shoulda had a V-8.

 

Related Posts with Thumbnails

About Nola Chick
Shaneika, a.k.a. Nola Chick, is a lifelong crazed Saints fan and creator of chicksinthehuddle.com. If she looks familiar, you may have seen her lose a Cadillac on "The Price is Right" with Bob Barker or win Super Bowl tickets on the Ellen Show. (She gets around...) Twitter Handle: @chicksndahuddle

Comments

  1. You got spunk, lady…

    (waits for it….)

    And the Broncos HATE spunk!

    I’m still banging my head into my desk. I’ll write something later.

  2. Jake says:

    Gramatica doesn’t need to take any flak from anybody. So he happened to miss his first two field goals, big deal. I’m not mad at him.

    I’M MAD AT THE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. Nola Chick says:

    well, it wouldn’t be such a big deal if making field goals weren’t his job. seeing as how it’s one of his primary jobs, i’d consider it kind of a big deal. and yeah, i know it’s the easy way out to scapegoat players. still, i remember what happened when we stuck with ocrapo b/c we didn’t want to “scapegoat’ him. we can’t afford to do that this year.

  4. saintseester says:

    can you imagine what the score would have been had deuce, marcus, and fujita been able to play? Ouch.

  5. Frank says:

    I wonder if there are a few million reasons why Deuce isn’t playing? How many of you remember this release from mid-April:

    “McAllister had a $1 million roster bonus due Tuesday but before paying it, the Saints and the running back reached agreement on a deal that will offer each side protection.

    Should the 29-year-old McAllister return and play up to the level that made him one of the league’s top running backs, he will have a chance to make much if not all of the $4.7 million that he could have this season.

    But if McAllister struggles to return to form on his two surgically repaired knees, the Saints will not have to pay him what he was scheduled to make this season.”

    No play, no pay–that’s something to think about when Deuce is on the sideline in critical short yardage situations.

  6. nolachick says:

    wow Frank. I honestly hadn’t even thought of that. But you gotta think the front office knows that at the end of the day, it’s in our best interest to win games. good seasons boost ticket sales and lead to more commerical opportunities for the teams, prime time games, etc. i mean, if money is the motive, we’ve got some real short-sighted fools making decisions behind the scenes

  7. Frank says:

    nolachick–It’s something to consider. I don’t know what the restructured contract says long term, but the old contract was paying Deuce a lot in the tail end (see below). Would it be unreasonable to think that the Saints may be trying to win without Deuce so they could opt out of the 20-million plus that he will get down the line? Sure they could just cut him, but that would be a very unpopular move if Deuce gets the chance to prove that he can still play–maybe they are afraid to give him that chance. That’s just one person’s theory which would explain why they aren’t giving him any runs or even putting him in as a decoy.

    Here are the terms of his original contract signed in 7/29/2005: Signed an eight-year, $50.1 million contract. The deal contains $12.5 million in guarantees, including annual $100,000 workout bonuses. 2008: $2.4 million, 2009: $3.2 million (+ $2 million roster bonus), 2010: $6.2 million, 2011: $7.1 million, 2012: $8.1 million, 2013: Free Agent

  8. Jake says:

    I suppose you wouldn’t be shocked or exstatic to hear, at this point, that the Saints have an injury to a guy named Jeremy Shockey. (3-6weeks)

Speak Your Mind

*