<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preseason Rankings: At Least We&#8217;re Not 32?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicksinthehuddle.com/2009/06/30/preseason-rankings-at-least-were-not-32/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicksinthehuddle.com/2009/06/30/preseason-rankings-at-least-were-not-32/</link>
	<description>A place for chicks who love football and the guys who love chicks who love football.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:48:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top Ten Things that Do Not Bode Well for the 2009 Season &#187; ChicksInTheHuddle.com - A place for chicks who love football and the guys who love chicks who love football.</title>
		<link>http://chicksinthehuddle.com/2009/06/30/preseason-rankings-at-least-were-not-32/comment-page-1/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Ten Things that Do Not Bode Well for the 2009 Season &#187; ChicksInTheHuddle.com - A place for chicks who love football and the guys who love chicks who love football.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicksinthehuddle.com/?p=6273#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>[...] Landing at the bottom of tons of preseason rankings lists. (Oh, and here’s a new one, care of Peter King.) 2. Deciding to dress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Landing at the bottom of tons of preseason rankings lists. (Oh, and here’s a new one, care of Peter King.) 2. Deciding to dress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
